The weeks following the end of the NFL season are some of the worst weeks of the year for football fans. Football fans like me now have to care about college basketball, the NBA, or hockey (great sports, but not exciting until their playoffs kick in). Since I don’t want to write about these sports, I’ll make 10 very early predictions for the 2006-2007 NFL season. 1. The Houston Texans will select Vince Young with the first overall pick on the draft.
They have kind of verbally committed to Reggie Bush already, but I think they’ll take Young. Remember last year when it seemed as though San Fran would take Aaron Rodgers with the first overall pick? Bush obviously won’t fall down to pick 24 like Rodgers did unless he has some freak injury, but I think he’ll fall down to New Orleans at 2 or Tennessee at 3. Taking Young just makes more sense for the Texans because he’s from Houston, the team already has a capable running back in Domanick Davis, he is an exciting player that will draw fans into the stadium, and he has much better mobility than that of David Carr, which will allow him to avoid the sacks that have plagued the team for the past few years. Also, they’ll realize that Bush isn’t really an every down back and that the speed advantage that he had in college will decrease dramatically in the pros. They might just take Bush anyway, but I think that Young is the best overall quarterback prospect coming out of college since Carson Palmer and the most exciting since Michael Vick.
2. Some big-name running backs will be in different uniforms next season.
This year, some of the best free-agent selections available are running backs, especially the Seahawks’ Shaun Alexander and the Colts’ Edgerrin James. While I think their teams should keep these running backs, I don’t think they will. Let’s start with Alexander. He just had one of the greatest individual seasons of all time (at least for his fantasy owners), so why is it even a question if Seattle will resign him? It’s all about the money. The Seahawks obviously love having Alexander, but I don’t think they want to pay him about $7 million a year on top of a huge signing bonus. They have to resign some other key players as well, especially at wide receiver. Also, Alexander is going into his seventh season, which is getting up there considering he is a running back. He has avoided injury his whole career, but that can’t last too much longer. Now let’s look at James. He has produced extremely well his entire career, and many of his teammates have said they want to keep him. So why will he be leaving Indy? Again, it comes down to the money. The Colts have recently signed Peyton Manning and Marvin Harrison to huge deals, so they won’t be able to supply enough for another long term deal. And unlike Alexander, James has had an injury history that has caused him to miss a full season. Since these star backs won’t be resigned, where will they end up? Probably Minnesota, Carolina, or Arizona. Those teams can come up with a long term deal with enough money to make Alexander or James happy, and they all have been plagued with inconsistency at the running back position in recent years.
3. The Seahawks will end the five-year streak of Super Bowl losers having a below .500 season the following year.
Obviously, if the Seahawks keep Shaun Alexander, winning their division will not be hard. But even if they don’t, they are still loaded with weapons on offense (assuming they sign a receiver in the off season) and also have great talent on defense. Seattle’s conference and division are just too weak for them to not produce another playoff season next year. I don’t envision the 49ers, Cardinals, or Rams getting significantly better this off season. The Rams might beat them in St. Louis, but not on the road. No one can challenge the Seahawks at Qwest Field, the NFL’s ultimate home-field advantage. Overall, I don’t think Seattle will have another 13-win season, but they’ll certainly win the NFC West.
4. Carolina will have the best record in the NFC next year.
Assuming, they can stay healthy, the Panthers can beat everybody in the NFC (except for the Seahawks at Qwest). Look for them to cruise through their division next year, as the Saints are in rebuilding mode under a new head coach, the Buccaneers peaked last season with their current crop of players, and the Falcons are too inconsistent for anyone to figure out. Jake Delhomme is a proven and competent quarterback, Steve Smith might be the best player in the NFL next year, and their defense will shut down opposing teams if Kris Jenkins and the gang avoid their injury problems that crippled them last year. If they can pick up another running back or if DeShaun Foster can avoid injury (which is like asking Eli Manning to consistently throw on-target passes), the Panthers will roll through the conference to Super Bowl XLI.
5. The Eagles will be much better next season.
I’m not saying they’re going to win their division, which looks to be the toughest in the NFC next year. Just don’t expect them to go 6-10 again or to lose a game 42-0 at home. If Donovan McNabb can avoid injury, he is without question the best quarterback in the NFC. Though the team probably needs another receiver, McNabb has shown in the past that he can win without a great receiving threat. At running back, Brain Westbrook is the best pass-catching back in the NFL, and he can break some long runs every once in a while. They also have a strong offensive line and an up-and-coming tight end in LJ Smith. Obviously this team has some problems to solve (like how to replace TO on offense), but I expect them to go around 8-8 in a division race that will go down to the wire.
6. Chicago will regress next season.
It seemed as though the Bears got every break possible during the 2005 season. If Joe Nedney had made that field goal so Nathan Vasher couldn’t return it for a touchdown, they would have lost to the 49ers. Though their defense will likely remain excellent in 2006, they won’t be near the almost record-breaking form they were last year. Brain Urlacher, the anchor of the defense, is suddenly getting older. I just don’t think it will be possible for them to allow 7 points per game at home again next year. Also, though Rex Grossman will keep getting better and will eventually be a star, the Bears lack a playmaking wide receiver unless they address this need in the off season. They just don’t have enough offense to compete again next year. Look for about a 7-9 record and for the Vikings to take the division at 9-7.
7. San Diego will finally put it all together next year.
The Chargers confounded everyone last year. They won at New England and were the only team to beat Indianapolis at its full strength. But losses to Miami, Kansas City and others kept them out of the playoffs. I think they’ll figure out a way to be more consistent next year. Their offense will be outstanding. LT will probably have his peak season for his career, Drew Brees (if he can recover from his shoulder injury) will cut down on interceptions, and Antonio Gates has the potential to lead the entire NFL in TD catches. The defense will continue to be stifling against the run–look for them to repeat last season’s league low rushing yards allowed title. This is a team that can truly beat any opponent on any given date. If they can win close games next year, they’ll head to Miami to face Carolina in the Super Bowl. (You heard it here first)
8. The Bengals and Steelers will have the most entertaining division title race in years.
I don’t remember the last time a divisional race was set up to be as great as this one is. This is actually developing into one of the league’s best rivalries. The key for the Bengals is if Carson Palmer can be back at full strength after that devastating knee injury against the Steelers. If he can recover, he has league MVP potential. If Palmer, Chad Johnson, and Rudi Johnson can all stay healthy, look for the Bengals to lead the league in points per game. On the Steelers side, they’ll be a top team once again if Big Ben can stay away from injury. They need to replace Jerome Bettis at short-yardage running back, but otherwise this team has no big needs. I don’t think they’ll repeat as Super Bowl champs, but they’ll obviously make the playoffs. Get ready, football fans–this divisional race will be one to remember.
9. Indianapolis will go 13-3, get a first round bye, and get eliminated in their first playoff game.
Indy just seems like a team that is built to win in the regular season but not in the playoffs. They’ll always blow out opponents in about 6-8 games, win 5-6 more because of Peyton Manning’s heroics, then win their division and get a home playoff game. This has happened for three years straight now. For some reason, Manning & crew cannot perform well against a good defense in the playoffs. The last three opponents to beat them in the playoffs were the Patriots twice and the Steelers recently. All of those teams were defensive-oriented. Also, I think that if the Colts were to ever win a Super Bowl in the Manning Era, it would have been last year. They started out 13-0, and in none of those games were they even challenged. Their defense even played well for the majority of the year. It just seemed like everything was going their way and that they were destined to win a championship. Even in their playoff game against the Steelers, they got every chance to win they could have asked for: the overturned Polomalu interception, the Bettis fumble, and the field goal at the end. And yet they couldn’t come through. My point is, if Indianapolis couldn’t win a Super Bowl in 2006, they won’t win one in 2007.
10. If the Pats can avoid injury, watch out for them in the playoffs.
The Patriots failed to win a Super Bowl for the first time since 2003 this past season. But don’t think that they will regress next year, because this team is built to win. If Corey Dillon and the receivers can stay healthy on offense, and the secondary gets some help, look for Tom Brady to lead this team back where it belongs–the Super Bowl. I don’t think that they necessarily will win the Super Bowl, but it would be foolish to rule them out of the race just because of one sub-par season.
12 replies on “Fearless Predictions for the 2006 NFL Season”
liked it. I liked your predictions but I think you’re forgetting that the Texans just re-upped David Carr for I think at least 3 more yrs. With the cap, they couldn’t afford to have Carr and Young. You hit it right on the ass when you said that they already have a good RB in Davis. So I think it would be smart to trade down and get D’Brickashaw Ferguson from Va. and use the additional pick to get another lineman. That’s where they need the most help. And on defense. I think they’re fine at the skill positions. Just a thought. Good article.
Good idea i forgot that they just resigned Carr when i wrote the article. I think that was a dumb move on thier part, because Young is a can’t miss quarterback prospect. Anyway, I agree with you, RJ, that they should trade down and get more draft picks instead of taking Bush with the first pick. They need help everywhere
Houston It’s not such a crazy idea for the Texans to take Vince Young. Carr knows the system really well, but he’s still a likely candidate for a sign and trade deal. They had been saying they only wanted a two year extension with him, but they went three..was the extra year for them…or some other team? Please don’t mess up Houston…please take Vince!
Help! March Madness is upon us and then the MLB season. Why are we talking NFL? Have we forgotten how atrocious the Super Bowl was, the officiating, the NFL’s lack of contrition and the fact that football is headed for a work stoppage in 2007? All that considered, it’s also February!
It’s simple I love baseball with every bit of me…but the truth is..football has become America’s sport. The draft is the offseason–so we can’t help but hope to better the season that will soon follow. Baseball is becoming more and more corrupt, college hoops honestly lacks a bit of excitement at times, with the stakes not being all that high. The bottom line is football is what most fans obsess about..this is just proving that.
I don’t agree College hoops is corrupt? And collewge football isn’t?
As for the NFL, I don’t buy the “most popular sport” line. It is played ONCE per week. If baseball were played once per week, you’d see what America’s favorite sport is, and always will be. The fact that a dozen MLB teams still sell out 155+ games per year says a lot more than 75,000 fans to watch Eagles-Giants.
I’m confused College hoops and college football being corrupt was never part of my comment. I feel college sports PERIOD simply lack the excitement and real talent the pros have, obviously.
I said baseball has become more and more corrupt. It’s getting worse everyday when the games top players are either failing drug tests, or shrinking into raisins (causing a freak drop in numbers). I’m not saying the NFL is a league of role models, but it’s def set up better to keep the stars looking good.
If tickets for an NFL game were reasonable, every stadium in the league would have to be expanded or re-built. Baseball has “america’s sport” because you can afford to take your family. The pricing is what holds football back.
Like I said, I love baseball, but the fact is, football holds the real excitement every fan waits year-round for. One game a week keeps everybody in it.
What? If baseball is “America’s Sport”, than how come every NFL Playoff game crushes the World Series in ratings?
once the nfl goes on strike that wont be the same anymore.
NFL is far more popular than MLB The NFL really IS the popular sport here in America now. One of the reasons is the one that was mentioned earlier as an excuse as to why the NFL sells out a higher percentage of games: MLB’s season is too long. 162 games?? Are you kidding me? I like to watch the History channel and read 1000+ page books, but 162 games puts me to sleep. And I PLAY baseball. It’s my favorite sport to play; I LOVE the game. But I’d rather watch pro football than pro baseball, whether it’s one game or an entire season. I have a long attention span, but not that long. Also many NFL franchises sell-out regular season games, while MLB often has trouble filling their stadiums for playoff games. And that doesn’t even begin to describe the disparity between TV ratings.
Facts about popularity Average attendance for an MLB game in 2003 was 28,051. Avg. att. for an NFL game in 2003 was 66,726. (Washington alone sells out EVERY single game even though they have sucked for quite some time. FedEx Field has over 92,000 seats.) You can explain that away with the ‘once a week’ excuse. But the TV ratings tell a different story. In 2003 the World Series captured only 25 percent of the US audience. By contrast, on any given weekend in 2003 NFL games were the TOP rated show on TV 73% of the time.
Sources: Attendance figures – kenn.com
TV ratings – usatoday.com, mlb.com
PS – Kaufman, if you have a source for your claim of “The fact that a dozen MLB teams still sell out 155+ games per year says a lot more than 75,000 fans to watch Eagles-Giants.” You claim it as a fact, but I tried to look for such a fact and couldn’t find it.
wow — Looking all the way back to these predictions, they are terrible!