Categories
NFL General

2005 NFL Predictions

2005 NFL Predictions
By Adam Nelson

Who will go from worst to first? Can Pittsburgh possibly win 14 or 15 games? Can the Patriots win a fourth title in five years? A lot of questions remain unanswered, but one thing is stuck in most fans’ minds- the dominance of New England the past four years. Although they should be a favorite to win it all again, they very likely won’t, and the absence of Tedy Bruschi will be a huge reason why. Here’s my predictions for how the standings will end. I may be far off, but this is how I see it:AFC East

1. New England (11-5): The Patriots have a very rough early season schedule (six 2004 playoff teams in first eight weeks), but they still dominate at home (one loss at home in last two seasons- in 2004 preseason), and have a strong defense, so they should prevail again as division champs. The Jets and Bills will be tough competition, though. They will very sorely miss Tedy Bruschi’s heart and talent.

2. New York (9-7): A playoff team from last year should be back in the playoffs again, if Pennington’s shoulder is healed and Curtis Martin puts forth another great rushing season. Their brutal schedule (10 games against teams with 8-8 or better records in 2004) will hold them back from a better year.

3. Buffalo (9-7): J.P. Losman will face growing pains this year. Willis McGahee will be a 1000-yard rusher again. Their defense and special teams talent is in the top 10 of the NFL. Were it not for a loss to Pittsburgh near the end of the 2004 season, they would have been in the playoffs.

4. Miami (5-11): Ronnie Brown won’t put up numbers as good as “Cadillac” Williams will in Tampa. Their qb situation is a complete mess right now, and if you don’t have a decent qb, you can’t win often in this league.

AFC North

1. Baltimore (10-6): If their offense plays as well as their defense, they will be a force to be reckoned with. If Kyle Boller is gonna produce, the time is now.

2. Pittsburgh (9-7): The only reason the Steelers won’t do well this year: their schedule. Games against New England, Jacksonville (twice), Baltimore (twice), Green Bay, Indianapolis and Minnesota are on the horizon.

3. Cincinnati (6-10): Their defense isn’t that good, but their offense is very talented.

4. Cleveland (4-12): What a stupid move it was to draft Kellen Winslow. New coach Romeo Crennel will make a positive impact for the Browns, but it won’t be felt till 2006.

AFC South

1. Indianapolis (11-5): Peyton Manning provides an encore to his amazing 2004 season with a first-round bye in 2005.

2. Houston (10-6): My surprise team of the year. Only five games against 2004 playoff teams, and two of those games are against the Colts. They’ll take advantage of one of the AFC’s easiest schedules.

3. Tennessee (8-8): Signing Travis Henry will end up being the best free-agent pickup of the year. They will compete for a playoff spot.

4. Jacksonville (5-11): They dropped the ball in not pulling off the trade for Travis Henry. Hopefully, Fred Taylor will recover in time to start in Week One.

AFC West

This is the toughest division of them all to pick a winner. It is completely wide open. If Randy Moss plays without any controversy, the Raiders could pull out this division. But will he?

1. Kansas City (10-6): Their defense bounces back, Dante Hall continues to be the league’s best kick returner, and Priest Holmes threatens for 20 touchdowns.

2. San Diego (9-7): Seven games against playoff teams, with five of them coming on the road. Ouch!

3. Denver (8-8): They will miss Reuben Droughns, and Jake Plummer just isn’t living up to his potential.

4. Oakland (7-9): Their running game just isn’t there (32nd in the NFL in 2004), and their defense isn’t good enough to slow down the point-machine teams of the AFC West.

NFC East

1. Philadelphia (9-7): It’s only a matter of time before this team starts struggling- they’ve dominated the NFC the last four seasons. They’ll win the division, but this is the year they miss the NFC Championship game. Terrell Owens is very unhappy in Philly, but hopefully he will put his bitter feelings towards the Eagles aside and just go out and show the talent that he has. Losing Pinkston for the year is a killer to that offense.

2. New York (7-9): Eli is no Peyton.

3. Dallas (6-10): The finale for Bill Parcells. This is the year where the team breaks down.

4. Washington (4-12): QB situation is unresolved; Sean Taylor’s legal woes continue to escalate; Portis doesn’t have the offensive line he had in Denver; should I go on? It’s gonna be a long year for the `Skins.

NFC North

1. Minnesota (11-5): They will be a lot better without Randy Moss than they would have been with him in 2005. Troy Williamson is speedy, but he can’t fill the shoes of Moss.

2. Green Bay (10-6): Javon Walker was involved in a lengthy holdout and is frustrated with his current contract, but that won’t be enough to cause Brett Favre to struggle. This could be Favre’s last year.

3. Detroit (8-8): Joey Harrington will never be as talented a player as he was at Oregon.

4. Chicago (4-12): As if losing Grossman for the year wasn’t bad enough, Benson’s holdout is only adding to the misery.

NFC South

1. Carolina (11-5): In my mind, I’m going with Carolina. They have too much talent to not get past Atlanta. Injuries destroyed the team last year, but if they stay relatively healthy, the South will be theirs.

2. Atlanta (10-6): They continue to rely too much on Vick. One man is not the whole team.

3. New Orleans (8-8): Deuce will run loose, but Saints won’t be running into the playoffs.

4. Tampa Bay (6-10): A huge fall-off from their title team of three years ago, but “Cadillac” is something special.

NFC West

1. Arizona (9-7): Kurt Warner’s back, and this will be one of the most surprising teams of the year.

2. Seattle (8-8): Gotta start winning the close games, and gotta keep pounding away with Shaun Alexander to wear out their opponents.

3. St. Louis (8-8): Last in the league in turnover differential last year, -24. It’s keeping them from being at the top of the NFC.

4. San Francisco (6-10): Injuries were brutal to the team in 2004. 2005 will be a better year for them, but they’re at least a year away from competing for the division title.

Playoff Seeds:
AFC
1)Indianapolis (11-5)
2)New England (11-5)
3)Kansas City (10-6)
4)Baltimore (10-6)
Wild Cards: Houston (10-6) and Pittsburgh (9-7)

NFC
1)Minnesota (11-5)
2)Carolina (11-5)
3)Philadelphia (9-7)
4)Arizona (9-7)
5)Atlanta (10-6)
6)Green Bay (10-6)

Playoffs
AFC
Kansas City over Pittsburgh, Houston over Baltimore
Indianapolis over Houston, New England over Kansas City
Championship: Indianapolis over New England

NFC
Philadelphia over Green Bay, Atlanta over Arizona
Minnesota over Atlanta, Carolina over Philadelphia
Championship: Minnesota over Carolina

Super Bowl XL
Indianapolis 31, Minnesota 21
MVP: Peyton Manning

16 replies on “2005 NFL Predictions”

2005 Predictions I posted this earlier today on an NFL forum before I read your article,

AFC

  1. Indianapolis (13 – 3 )
  2. Baltimore ( 11 – 5 )
  3. New England ( 10 – 6 )
  4. Kansas City ( 10 – 6 )

  5. New York ( 9 – 7 )
  6. Cincinnati ( 10 – 6 )

NFC

  1. Minnesota ( 12 – 4 )
  2. Philadelphia ( 11 – 5 )
  3. Carolina ( 10 – 6 )
  4. Seattle ( 10 – 6 )

  5. Atlanta ( 9 – 7 )
  6. New York ( 9 – 7 )

Wild Card Weekend

New England 31 – 17 Cincinnati
Kansas 35 – 21 New York Jets

Carolina 21 – 14 New York Giants
Atlanta 28 – 27 Seattle

Division Games

Indianapolis 38 – 35 Kansas City
Baltimore 17 – 13 New England

Minnesota 27 – 7 Atlanta
Philadelphia 21 – 17 Carolina

Championship Games

Baltimore 24 – 21 Indianapolis
Minnesota 31 – 13 Philadelphia

Superbowl XL

Minnesota 30 – 24 ( OT ) Baltimore

I hope your right with the Vikings for the NFC.

Really enjoyed the article, thanks

the eagles might not win but there is no f’ing way Minnesota wins the NFC.  A team that loses Randy Moss and still have Mike Tice as coach? Please.

They got a good shot…. But the NFC is WIDE open….I think that Carolina also has a hell of a shot to represent the NFC

Are you on drugs? 4. Washington (4-12): QB situation is unresolved; Sean Taylor’s legal woes continue to escalate; Portis doesn’t have the offensive line he had in Denver; should I go on? It’s gonna be a long year for the `Skins.

Do you keep up with football?  Joe Gibbs named Ramsey the 2005 starter pretty much right after the season ended.  Portis was the NFC’s leading rusher last season, 3rd in the NFL.  There is no QB situation this season, Portis, behind a busted injured line still lead the NFC and finished 3rd overall in the NFL in rushing.  If Jansen and Samuels stay healthy, the O-Line will be fine.  

The only correct comment you made was about Sean Taylor.  I am not saying the Skins will go to the superbowl, but to short change them as a 4-12 team is ridiculous.  They also had the 3rd overall best defense in the NFL………..

The ‘Skins If the Skins have such an established starter, then why draft Jason Campbell in the first round?????? Ramsey only had 10 touchdown passes last season….Manning had that after like three games…..Ramsey is hardly a great QB, and probably won’t last the whole year…..

Portis is behind a less than average offensive line in Washington, and only had seven touchdowns (14 in the previous year with the Broncos).

True, their defense is good, but their offense is pretty weak.

And, no, I’m not on drugs…..

Like you said…WAY off! As the previous poster pointed out, your assessment of the 2005 Redskins is, in your own words, “way off”.  Patrick Ramsey has been named the starter and I guarantee Joe Bugel will have his line making gaping holes for Clinton Portis this year.  Sean Taylor and his legal woes will only provide motivation for him to continue to excel on the field.  I’m a realist and I can easily see the Redskins finishing 8-8.  At best, they’ll go 12-4.  Either way, Joe Gibbs will not be staring at another losing season as you have erroneously predicted.  

The Skins When has anything ever motivated the Skins (at least recently)? They’ve had one playoff berth in the past six seasons. You need to give more of a reason for a major change than just Sean Taylor’s legal problems “motivating” the team. By the way, you didn’t tell me why the Skins drafted Campbell as a first round pick if Ramsey will be the starter, unless the Skins agree with me that Ramsey is awful. Also, the Skins have had only three winning records in the past 12 seasons, and haven’t had a winning record in the past five . I’m from Northern Va. and I like the Skins, too, but I don’t think that they’re the team that will stop the Eagles. Besides- the Skins will be in salary cap hell very soon, which really stinks.

skins 2005 Look at thier back-up options, Mark Brunell.  They got rid of Hassleback.  You should know that the Skins always have 3 QB spots, they had to fill one of them up.  They are also thinking ahead to the future.  I agree that Ramsey is not a great QB and probably will not ever be.  But at the same time, I don’t think he has had the opportunity to develop.  He didn’t play most of his rookie season, then got fed to the crows his second season under Spurrier (when the O-line was horrid).  Not to mention that Spurrier was such a dumbass he would have one back blocking Michael Strahan 1v1………..which is about the most retarded thing I ever witnessed.

Last year, Ramsey did not start until towards the end of the season.  Coming into the messes Brunell made when they are already getting beat shouldn’t count against him.  I guarentee that if Ramsey had been the starter for all 16 games last year we would have finished 8-8 or 9-7 and taken that wildcard spot in a weak NFC.  

I do not believe there is any conterversy at the QB spot.  Ramsey has been given the offense and told to go with it.  Plus, to accomidate for his slow foot speed, he will be operating alot out of the shotgun this year.  I wouldn’t dog Portis either based on touchdowns.  Yes Denver had a better O-line to run behind, he still finished around 200 yards shy of the 1500 yard season he had in 2003.  But you need to look at the teams he played against in 2003.  San Diego, Oakland, and Kansas City had some of the worst defenses that year.

http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NFL/DEF-RUSHING/2003/regular

That is six games agaist horrible run defenses and one of the best O-lines in the game at that time.

I know stats show alot, but some times they are misleading.  Especially if say a QB doesn’t start the first 9 games of the season.  I would imagine that not starting and finding a rhythem would be difficult.  

Some re-editing may be needed….. Now that Todd Pinkston’s season for the Eagles has come to an abrupt end. Looks like T.O. is holding all the cards now as far as bargaining for a new deal goes….Maybe with Pinkston’s injury, the Eagles might be struggling to win the division, even though it’s pretty weak.

Predictions Let’s start with the AFC where I don’t think you really did too badly.
I totally agree that Baltimore will be strong.
Indianapolis to win 13! games and make the Super Bowl? Ahead of both New England and Baltimore? No way. I also think that Pittsburg may have something to say on the whole matter.
Now to the NFC.
Although I feel bad for the Redskins’ fans who have posted here already, I agree that Washington is a very poor team. 4-12 seems about right in my mind (sorry guys).
It is very easy to project Philadelphia as the winner of the NFC East. Look at the compitition, NYG, Dallas, and Washington. It could be argued that this may be the weakest division in the NFL.
I don’t think Atlanta wins 10 games in the NFC South. Carolina will win the division but I think Atlanta is way overated.
Minnesota to win the Super Bowl??? (and go 12-4!!) Without a decent running back and no Randy Moss they are going to be far better this year than last year?? Not a chance. (At first I was going to ask you if you were from Minnesota but I see your in VA).
The Arizona Cardinals to WIN the NFC West?? Your serious, right? They are going to finish ahead of both St. Louis and Seattle because.. because they have Kurt Warner?? Warner, who has done nothing for like three years now?? This and your Minnesota predictions are the biggest stretches I have heard so far.
Predictions are hard to make before the season even starts. But here are mine.
Neither of your Super Bowl teams, Minnesota or Indianapolis even makes the final four.
AFC Championship: New England vs. Baltimore or Pittsburg.
NFC Championship: Philadelphia vs. Carolina or St. Louis.
The whole thing could very well end up a repeat of last years’ New England vs. Philadelphia.

Season Win-Lose Record BTW Stat Man, I was just curious if you relised that by your total league won-lose predictions you have the NFL going 266-246 this year? (I do know that in football, even assuming a few tie games, you must have an equal number of winners and loosers). If you take a few of those extra wins away from Minnesota, Indianapolis, Atlanta, and Arizona you may come out pretty close!

I didn’t work that out beforehand…. to make sure that the wins and losses equal out. Didn’t even think anyone would go back and check to see if it would equal out….

Guess I can bump Philly down a few more wins, b/c of all they’re going through now…

as far as not having NE in the Super Bowl….I’m a huge Pats fan, but I am a realist, too, and would love to see them win it all again, but i think it’s asking too much…..
Why is it so hard to believe that Arizona could win the West??? That division is so terrible it’s totally up for grabs…..
Minnesota has a few good backs (Bennett, Mewelde Moore), and they are loaded at the receiver spot, with Marcus Robinson, Nate Burleson, and the rookie Williamson. If they can run nearly as much as they pass, they should do well.
I think Carolina has just as good a shot at representing the NFC as Minnesota or (ugh)Philadelphia. I’m so sick of Philly, and I can’t stand Atlanta (cause I like Carolina, too).

By the way, I grew up in VA and am in NC, to the one who said I was in VA.

sorry…. “The Arizona Cardinals to WIN the NFC West?? Your serious, right?”

Yup.

Kurt Warner has what he had in St. Louis: a great young receiver. The difference is that Anquan Boldin is BETTER than Torry Holt. Sure, he does not have another receiver, but he does have a great coach (remember Vermeil, which Martz and Coughlin were not), and a damn good running back (Marcel Shipp, who is not as good as he had in St. Louis, but close).

He has was he needs. Plus, the team is improved on both sides of the ball.

I had ‘Zona back in April to reach the Super Bowl. Right now my three sleeper teams are Chicago, Cinci, and ‘Zona.

Do not be surprised when they actually do well.

I don’t know…. about Boldin being better than Holt. I think that’s a stretch. Holt is a hell of a player.
Don’t forget that the Cardinals also have young talent in Larry Fitzgerald and the great rookie JJ Arrington at running back, who will start this year.

They’ll win anywhere from 8-10 and win the West.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *