Categories
Cincinnati Reds

Why Charlie Got Hustled: The Long Overdue Call From the Hall

“Playing baseball for a living is like having a license to steal.” – Pete Rose

Major League Baseball has committed a sin; an absolute crime. They have robbed a man of his lifelong dream; of the ultimate accomplishment in the game that he loves more than anything in the world. He was robbed of this achievement, which he rightfully earned, and perhaps deserved more than any other player in the history of the game. Pete Rose was cruelly robbed of his place as a baseball immortal.

“The banishment for life of Pete Rose from baseball is a sad end of a sorry episode. One of the game’s greatest players has engaged in a variety of acts which have stained the game, and he must now live with the consequences of those acts. There is absolutely no deal for reinstatement.” – Bart Giamatti

At least Commissioner Giamatti acknowledged that Rose was one of the best players to ever grace a diamond. But with this announcement on August 24, 1989, Giamatti banished one of the greatest heroes of the sport and cast a dark shadow over the game.

Since Charlie Hustle’s banishment that fateful day, we have never seen another player with so much heart, hustle and determination as him. Rose collected hits like they were being handed out for free: He is the all-time record holder for most hits in a career with 4,256 and currently holds the second longest hitting streak in the history of baseball, one that lasted 44 games. Rose finished his 24-year career with a .303 batting average and a .375 on-base percentage and holds the all-time record for most games played and most at-bats. If he could, he would’ve played every inning of every game for his entire life. That’s how much Rose was in love with baseball.

Rose won the National League MVP award in 1973 and Rookie of the Year in 1963. He made 17 all-star appearances at five different positions, and won three World Series titles with the Cincinnati Reds. He was MVP of the 1975 World Series and a leader of the `Big Red Machine’. He won three batting titles, two gold gloves, and has more seasons of 200+ hits than anyone else, with 10. Rose was extremely versatile too, playing over 500 games at five different positions over his career.

So what is a player with such amazing credentials doing sitting on the bench, riding the pine, NOT in the Hall of Fame? The reason is that Commissioner Giamatti banished Rose from baseball for betting on the Reds as their manager, a charge Rose denied, but still agreed to be placed on baseball’s ineligible list for. Rose denied the ruling for years after his expulsion, until 2004, when he published a book called My Prison Without Bars, an autobiography in which he admitted to betting on baseball.

Seventeen years after Rose’s ban, he has yet to be re-instated and still watches the Hall of Fame inductions every year instead of being included in them. So was Rose’s betting on the Reds really “detrimental to baseball” as Giamatti claimed? Is it really any worse than taking steroids to enhance one’s play? Because if it is, it’s unfair that sluggers like Barry Bonds and Mark McGwire will most likely be Hall of Famers and Rose won’t. Today, people are arguing that Bonds should be a first-ballot Hall of Famer based on accomplishments alone, not on merit. Well, Bonds pumped up his muscles, lied to the Supreme Court, and unnaturally changed his performance. That is a lot more detrimental to the game then betting on a team you manage. Besides, it’s not like Rose was paying the pitchers to throw the ball down the middle.

Steroids and gambling: both can be unhealthy, both are illegal in baseball, but only one physically affects how an individual plays the game. I’m not saying steroids helped Barry Bonds have a beautiful swing, have the power to hit a home run, have a better eye at the plate, or have loads of talent. In fact, I agree that Bonds should be in the Hall of Fame based on his career before 2001. But, if Bonds is a Hall of Famer, Rose is undoubtedly one as well. Both players made a choice and both have been criticized for what they’ve done. The only difference is Rose got the ultimate heave-ho. Rose committed a crime against baseball that is much less harmful to the game, yet he was punished in the harshest way possible. Bonds and other substance-abusers are getting to walk free, and with every step they taint the game a little bit more.

 The bottom line is that Rose betting on baseball was a minor crime compared to what’s going on today, for two reasons. First, Rose’s play and managerial tactics were not affected in any way, shape or form. Secondly, what Rose did does not resonate with younger players who look up to the pros and try to mimic everything they do. Steroids have crept all the way into high school locker rooms, and there is no doubt in my mind that part of the blame has to go to the professional players who make it seem okay to be juiced. Rose is a god and a role model compared to some of the superstars of today.

“I think just about everybody ought to get a second chance and I’d like to see it worked out, because he brought a lot of joy to the game, and he gave a lot of joy to people, and he’s paid a price – God knows, he’s paid a price.” – Bill Clinton

Of course you think everybody deserves a second chance, Bill. Of course you do. Jokes aside, our former President makes a couple good points. Rose really did bring a lot of joy to the game and he really did pay a price. Being thrown out of the baseball world and stomped on for seventeen years is a pretty good price to pay. We baseball fans have never seen a player who hustled all-around as much as Rose did since he was banished and I don’t know if we’ll ever see someone with as much heart and who loved the game more than he did.

“Somebody’s gotta win and somebody’s gotta lose and I believe in letting the other guy lose.” – Pete Rose

The picture I ripped out of Sports Illustrated that is on my wall says it all. It’s a shot of Rose in 1976 sliding headfirst into third base, his body completely off the ground, eyes full of steely determination, focused on nothing but reaching the bag safely. That is how he played for 24 years straight. Now, I challenge you to find a player today who has never jogged to first on a groundout or who has played his heart out on every pitch of every inning of every game of every season. Let me save you some trouble: You won’t find one.

There are no Pete Roses left in baseball. Charlie Hustle played harder than anyone else and never let up. He played every game like it was his last and did whatever he could to win. Without a doubt, at the very least, this man deserves re-instatement to baseball. I’m too young to have ever seen him play, but I still envy and worship him as a player, for moments I’ve seen clips of and heard about; plays that I will never forget.

Scene: 1970 All-Star Game in Cincinnati, bottom of the 12th inning. Rose is on second after his leadoff single, Bill Grabarkewitz of the Dodgers is on first, and the Cubs’ Jim Hickman is at the plate. (The All-Stars back then would play the game to win, but it was still an exhibition in a way, just to assure players’ safety. And unlike today, there was just pride on the line, no home-field advantage for the World Series.) Unfortunately for Indians’ catcher Ray Fosse though, Pete Rose was of a different breed. He didn’t care about getting hurt, just as long as his team won the game. So, when Hickman singled to center and Rose came barrelling around third, looking to score the winning run, he ran over Fosse, who was blocking the plate, and won the game for the National League. That’s how Rose played: to win at any expense.

“Does Pete hustle? Before the All-Star game he came into the clubhouse and took off his shoes and they ran another mile without him.” – Hank Aaron

Everyone who played with him or against him knew it. They knew he was one of a kind. The kind that had so much desire to win and so much love for the game that nothing would slow him down. They all knew that he was a star and that he would eventually have a spot in the Hall of Fame. If Rose was re-instated today, he would be unanimously voted in on the first ballot and rightfully so.

With the way rules are already bent so much on a daily basis in every level of baseball, it’s hard to believe that Commissioner Bud Selig can’t re-instate the best pure hitter to ever play the game. It seems like the only reason he won’t, is he’s either afraid of the backlash from people who support the decision to ban Rose, or he just doesn’t want to be the one to do it. When cheaters like Bonds and Sammy Sosa are given pardons and second chances, it’s a travesty of monumental proportions that Rose doesn’t even get the place in Cooperstown that he deserves.

We all know that the Cincinnati Reds organization subliminally supports Rose in his quest for re-instatement and wants him to be inducted into the Hall of Fame. How do we know this? It’s not just a coincidence that Rose’s number 14 jersey has not been worn full-time by any other Reds player since Rose played (His son had a short stint with the team in which he was issued his father’s number). It’s sort of an informal retirement of the number out of respect by the Reds, because as part of the lifetime ban, the Reds were not allowed to officially retire his jersey.

“When you play this game twenty years, go to bat ten-thousand times, and get three-thousand hits, do you know what that means? You’ve gone zero for seven-thousand.” – Pete Rose

This article may simply sound like a plea to get Pete Rose into the Hall of Fame. And in a way, it is. But, mostly, I am just giving one of the greatest of all time his due. He deserves to be given a second chance and deserves to be in the Hall of Fame amongst the rest of the best players in baseball history. Rose gave his life to baseball, the least baseball can do is give it back.

“I’d walk through hell in a gasoline suit to play baseball.” – Pete Rose

And I’m sure he’d do the same to have a plaque in the Hall of Fame of the game he loved.

Sources:

1. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pete_Rose>
2. <http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/player.php?p=rosepe01>

 

9 replies on “Why Charlie Got Hustled: The Long Overdue Call From the Hall”

Does anyone else… …find it ironic, that if you’re timing is right, clicking on the headline or ‘full story’ to view the whole page, the advertisement at the top sometimes says ‘BET ON BASEBALL’?

That’s a little bit funny if you ask me.

Charlie hustler Nice tribute…he played the game at a superb level.

The fact remains – he lied (denial of betting) and he did bet on baseball.  Which means he broke the rules… like others who aren’t in the Hall of Fame.

Perhaps Rose should start his own shrine (or maybe one could pop up here on the Sportscolumn site)… the Hall of inFame (or is that Infamy?).

Feel sorry for him? Sure – but it is more like, “too bad he had such bad judgement – he could have been in the Hall of Fame”.

Reinstate him? Not a chance – where does the line get drawn then?  Great players who lie cheat and ignore the rules – what is the point of the game then?

Then why? Why are players who used steroids going to be inducted?

It seems like Rose was banned from baseball because he did something immoral, not because he bet on baseball…His betting did not affect the game at all or the people around him, just himself.

As a Phillies fan I should be a Rose apologist but I’m not.  There’s one rule in the clubhouse and that’s DO NOT BET ON BASEBALL.  Pete Rose did.  

I don’t think the steroids users should get in the Hall either but Rose certainly doesn’t belong there.  Whether it’s hypocritical or not (and yes it is) it’s the #1 rule.  You can’t violate the #1 rule.  It’s like talking about Fight Club.

Perception is reality I am definitely against the steroid slammers getting in the Hall of Fame too.  and even if they do, two wrongs don’t make it right so Rose shouldn’t be there.

His betting did affect the people around him – he shamed the Phillies.

Rose’s betting could be allegorious to the Black Sox scandal.  How do we know he wouldn’t (or didn’t) bet against his team and leave a pitcher in too long or change the line up to make for worse fielding or batting just to win his bet…  we don’t know – but gambling can cause people to do funny things.  Even the perception that it was possible to throw games that he bet on would be enough – it is immoral and it breaks the rules –

Definition of the Word You cannot say that Pete Rose does not belong in the baseball hall of FAME. I know he committed the ultimate sin of sports and he should have been banned. But you cannot keep one of the greatest players ever out of the hall. We have never talked about erasing or asticing his records. By the fact that he was a great and his records stand, I think you have to put Pete Rose into the Hall of Fame, even if it is with an astrice. In baseball Pete Rose is famous, whether he is officially in the game or not, Charlie Hustle deserves a plaque.

Rose The thing that got me with Rose was that in an interview I saw with him once he made a comment about how he would be able to charge two or three times as much for his autograph if he was inducted into the hall of fame. All he really cares about is the money.

So what?! Barry Bonds is an asshole too. Mickey Mantle wasn’t that great of a guy. I’m sure a few other HOFers cared as much about the money as the accomplishment. But I can GUARANTEE you right now that Rose does not want to be re-instated and put in the HOF just to charge more for an autograph. The man loved the game, that’s why he wants in.

If anything, Rose shamed the Reds. But isnt the HOF a shrine to the greatest baseball players to live, not a shrine to the great players who also led perfectly moral lives?

The Major League Baseball Hall of Fame: Where the best of the best are enshrined for their baseball careers. Yeah, their baseball careers not their lives outside of baseball, even if their actions may have had something to do with baseball.

And, it’s safe to say that Rose didn’t leave pitchers in too long purposely, etc. because he was a great manager and had a winning ballclub. Besides did you miss the memo where he didn’t bet AGAINST the Reds?

and ONE Your reasoning is why I feel the same about Rose. I also don’t buy the argument that betting is less of an offense than steroids.

Simple test: is it safer to say that more players would be likely to use (have used) steroids than bet on games?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *