I wonder how Billy Beane will feel when he’s watching the MLB playoffs at home, with his Oakland A’s floundering to the deep, cold, piteous cellar of the AL West, after he single-handedly abolished any chance of his team making the playoffs when he traded away two of his most electrifying starters, thus entrusting his reputation with the less-than-proven likes of Rich Harden and Danny Haren.
Probably humiliated.
Especially when he sees those two electrifying starters dueling in Game 1 of the National League Championship Series.
No, actually…then he’ll feel suicidal.
And in case you missed it, I did imply that the Atlanta Braves and St. Louis Cardinals will be playing for the National League pennant.
The Cardinals will be stomping in familiar ground, only this time, their armed with a deadly gun-slinging, inning eating machine in Mark Mulder and a high-octane lineup to compliment.
As for the Braves, losing stud outfielder J.D. Drew didn’t make their offense any better, but the addition of Tim Hudson polished off an already shimmering starting five.
Last season, the Cards had one mindset: score often, and in bunches. And that’s what they did–6th in runs scored, 7th in hits, 7th in home runs, 4th in batting average and 2nd in slugging percentage. Their pitchers were efficient too, (2nd in opponent batting average and 2nd in team ERA) but it seemed like a facade.
And in the World Series, the facade was exposed and the true Cardinals pitching staff was revealed: a staff lacking a truly dominant starter who can carry the weight of his team on his shoulders.
The Red Sox had that dominant starter in Curt Schilling. We all remember Schilling’s bloody sock last year in New York and countless other heroic efforts the entire post-season. We all remember when the zealous, fastball hurling madman, Roger Clemens, was ringing up opponents and racking up rings with the Yankees. It’s pitchers like these who a team can build around and the Cards may have found their man in Mulder.
Last season, Mulder threw 225 plus innings and achieved a 17-8 record. Currently, Mulder has a record of 7-1 and a 3.72 ERA. In comparison to years past, those numbers aren’t up to par. That tells you how great a pitcher Mulder is capable of being. Not only does he add a devastating array of pitches to the Cards arsenal, a fastball, slider, curve and changeup he can locate consistently, his commanding, imposing, intimidating persona radiates throughout the locker room, which only benefits his teammates. He brings 200 innings to the table almost every season, and has never thrown less than 150 innings in a season. When healthy, Mulder is one of the most dominant yet cunning pitchers in the majors. And right now, he seems pretty healthy: 4th in wins and 5th in innings pitched. If the Cards had Mulder last season, they definitely would not have been swept by the Red Sox.
A lineup with more nitrous than the hot rods in Fast and the Furious, and the long-awaited, desperately needed power pitcher makes the St. Louis Cardinals a trendy pick to repeat and reach the World Series.
But not so fast. The Atlanta Braves added depth in the rotation and maintained the core of an already explosive offense. It’s going to be a tight race this year.
Last season, the Braves pitching was in a league of its own: 1st in team ERA and 4th in OPS. Expect much of the same this season. No, actually, expect more. The recently acquired Hudson has a dazzling 3.29 career ERA and a prodigious 97-42 record.
After a “sub-par” 2004 season, 12-6 record, 3.53 ERA, Hudson is back in all-star form boasting a 3.05 ERA. He possesses a solid fastball which tops out in the low 90’s and a deceptively sly changeup. But its Hudson’s dust-kicking, bottom-dropping, knee-busting splitter that earns him his living. And what does a splitter make batters do? Hit grounders. Hudson had twice as many ground outs as fly outs in 2004, and with a middle infield consisting of Rafael Furcal, the speedy, elusive shortstop with a cannon for an arm, and the rangy, soft-handed Marcus Giles at 2nd, it’s going to be tough to squeak a ball past this tandem. And even if the batters do manage to hit it in the air, the most explosive gatekeeper in center, Andrew Jones, will be on patrol.
Both of these teams have potent lineups, both have a dominant starter as well as a collection of reliable pitchers to backup and support the ace, and both play smart, crisp defense. So what’s the deciding factor, the one component that will propel one team to the World Series and the other to their living rooms? These clubs are near mirror images of each other–a dominant starter, an awe inspiring center fielder that makes scaling over a 10-foot high fence look like child’s play and a team defense with more brains than Bill Gates and Albert Einstein combined. Even their managers are seasoned, hardened, battle-tested veterans.
The answer: depth in the starting five–or, in their case, the starting seven. And guess who has the advantage? No, it’s not the defending National League Champions; it’s the lose-in-the-first-round-when-you’re-better-than-that Atlanta Braves. While the Cardinals have five potential starters at their disposal, like most teams, the Braves have seven hurlers who can start. Count them: Hudson, John Smoltz, Mike Hampton, 25 year old lefty Horacio Ramirez, John Thompson, Jorge Sosa and 21 year old Kyle Davies, who, by the way, has a 2-0 record as starter and a 0.00 ERA.
And while Mulder, Matt Morris, Jeff Suppan, Jason Marquis and Chris Carpenter may be good, in the playoffs, the team with the freshest arms has the edge, and with these two teams so closely related, something as seemingly diminutive as this can have a tremendous impact.
So while Billy Beane sits and reminisces about the terrible mistake he made letting his two aces go, these brilliant geniuses of deception and dominance will be dueling, fist to fist, pitch by pitch, in one of the most memorable and unforgettable NLCS match ups ever–and all Billy can do is watch.
15 replies on “The Beane irony”
time will tell I think the timing of your article could not be any worse. Not to mention you fail to take into consideration in other factors besides Hudson and Mulder. Taking three issues into account that I shall mention it might not be proveable yet that Beane is at fault.
Firstly, pitchers do not win without run support. Look at Clemens ERA then his record. A 1.30 ERA and a 3-3 record. Now Oakland and Houston are 29,30 batting average, 28, 30 in hits, 29, 30 in runs, 29, 30 in homeruns and 28, 30 in RBI’s. Yet the staff ERA’s are 22, 17. All are listed as Houston then Oakland. Each team is 19 and 32. If this is not evidence that pitchers find it hard to win without hitting support I would not know what is. If Clemens is 3-3 I do not believe Mulder and Hudson would be improving the hitters on Oakland to a significant level.
Secondly Haren is young and Harden is on the IL. Haren’s 4.34 ERA is good not great and his walk strikeout ration needs some work. Harden was 2-3 with a 2.80 ERA. A better ERA then Moulder who is 7-2 with a 3.62 ERA and on run happy St. Louis. Slightly better ERA than Hudson who is 6-3 with a 3.00 ERA.
Finally Beane’s moves need to be tested over time. The decision he made was to try to win later and to get something now for players they would not be able to resign. I for one would wait to see if in 2 months or next season when the A’s are hitting well if there record improves. I would not be surprised if it went up. It still might be a terrible mistake but I think it still can be looked upon as a good move in two to three years.
First off… ….i’d like to thank you for your comments.
Secondly, ur right, time will tell. Do i think Harden has the potential to be a good pitcher, yes. Haren hasnt played enough yet. But none of that really matters.
The bottom line is that any person in the right mind would take hudson adn mulder over haren and harden…and if you wouldnt, ur as stupid as billy beane.
Its not like hudson and mulder are 40 yrs old, they are in the prime of their careers.
And lastly, the A’s were not a team that needed to completley rebuild. Retool, yes, but not rebbuild. They already had no offense, they lose tejada, then the only good part of their team, starting pitching, is broken up to. Beane did nothing to put this team in the right direction. He got no hitters and lost 2 of the top pitchers in baseball….how smart does that make him?
I agree The only really poor move he made, at least that I’m ready to judge now, was getting Jason Kendall at the same salary that he could’ve had Miguel Tejada with.
He’s not trying to win now So we can’t judge how smart that makes him. I would take Harden and Zito over Mulder and Hudson for the future any day.
Beane… …had the pieces to make a playoff run this year, until he gave away mulder, hudson and tejada. now he has nothing, except a couple of guys that could be good.
And i would take mulder and hudson over zito and harden any day in the future, mainly because hudson and mulder, in my opinion, are better than zito and harden might not even be as good as zito. so all in all, mulder and hudson are just better.
money issues we have to remember the reasons why Beane dumped Mulder and Hudson in the first place: contracts. The A’s are a small market team, and Beane’s philosophy has also been sell high, buy low. The A’s probably wouldn’t have been able to sign one or both, so Beane was able to trade for prospects, some of whom (Haren, Calero, Blanton) are MLB-ready and young.
Secondly, Mulder was 12-2 at the All-Star break last year, 5-6 after. Maybe all those innings he has logged over the years are finally starting to haunt him. I wouldn’t start singing his praises until he pitches like an All-Star in September and October, which he never has been able to do (why have the A’s never made it past the first round?)…
True… …there are money issues, but you cant afford to lose the core of your team when ur in contention for a playoff spot. If the team stinks, then yes, you unload for prospects, but u dun do that w/ a contending team, u juss cant.
And why have they never made it past the first round? hitting. They cant and never were able to hit. And theyre even worse now
Well in that case He was still right. Have you ever followed a small market team? If they don’t sacrifice a year or two of competitiveness to rebuild, they’ll just be forced to later on. If they do it on their own terms, it will take much less time than rebuilding from nothing.
agreed agree with IanB – Beane’s goal is not to contend this year, but to contend every year. if they had kept Hudson and Mulder, both of whom i would also take for the future over Zito and Harden (or Haren, Cruz, et al) if money were no object, they might have contended this year (no guarantees), but then they would have received nothing but draft picks when they lost them both to free agency after this year and next. since draft picks are hit-or-miss and take much longer to bear fruit, Beane proactively got some major league talent to keep his team competitive, and some prospects that will help build the offense in the future.
Isn’t it ironic… — that, every year, some schlub who thinks he knows baseball better than the game’s best GM, counts the A’s out only to eat his words when they make a run at the playoffs.
Billy Beane is a competitor who will always have his teams ready to compete. Now, the A’s may not make the playoffs this year, but they will play meaningful games in September, as they have for the past five years. Like the Oakland Raiders, the A’s don’t rebuild, they reload. The only difference is that the A’s do it through prospects. People expect little from players such as Dan Haren or Joe Blanton who have done so little, but Beane’s track record is too solid to think that these two cannot be as productive as Mulder and Hudson over time.
The fact is: the A’s have never lost an irreplacable player under Beane. Going back a few years, McGwire’s “production” at first base was surpassed by Giambi during Giambi’s years in Oakland. Tejada put up MVP numbers after Giambi left. Crosby won ROY after Tejada bolted and now, in his second year, is the team’s offensive leader. True, the production may not always equal that of the departed player (e.g. Mark Kotsay replacing Johnny Damon or Octavio Dotel replacing Keith Foulke replacing Billy Koch replacing Jason Isringhousen). But, the farm system is intact and, year in and year out, the A’S WILL BE COMPETITIVE.
maybe…. ….they will be competitive, (by competitive i mean making the playoffs) but not this year and certinley not next year either. haren and harden great players? maybe. we dont know and billy beane doesnt no.
the focus on this article wasnt on billy beane…i used beane as a connetor between hudson and mulder.
Gammons’ Take — A quote from Peter Gammons’ ESPN column today:
The Mark Mulder trade obviously worked, but now that Dan Meyer is over his shoulder problems and throwing in the low 90s (as opposed to 84-85 in spring training) and Juan Cruz is lighting it up as a starter in Triple-A, the Tim Hudson trade may not be lost, after all.
second thoughts??? — I wonder how you feel about writing this article now. humiliated? suicidal? Thanks to Billy Beane, the A’s winning percentage is over .700 since you wrote the article and (absent a collapse) they are headed to their fifth trip to the playoffs in six years.
"absent a collpase" This is the same thing that happens every year, the A’s stink, then they surge, and then we all wake up and realize they arent serious contenders. So what if they make they playoffs (which they might not) they are still not a legit team to win the WS…its the same cycle year in and year out…
why you do not write an article like this As a professional writer you need to be much more careful making predicitions like this. Being wrong means next time you make a call no one will take it seriously. It is better to judge things in long term respective when everything has panned out. For example a really bad trade was the Seattle trading to Boston for Slocumb a few years back. Or by making a preciction on Tampa or Colorado, teams which usally live close to expectations. Better luck in your future articles.