![]() |
|||||||
|
By collegefbfan8898, Section College
I am not going to fuss about the BCS system determining a champion. I am not going to pitch the best commercial in the world for a college football playoff. Division 1A football, or FBS, is not going to go that route. However, I do want to fuss about the love fest that is called Hawaii. I really don't care what Mark May, Lou Holtz, Kirk Herbstreit, and/or Lee Corso says about this football team deserving a BCS shot, the Warriors simply do not. There are a lot of reasons to support the argument that they do belong in a BCS bowl game. But look deeper and uncover the facts.
OK. I have no idea what I am talking about, right. Check the stats. Hawaii's strength of schedule is 117th out of 119 division 1A teams. Not counting the division 1AA teams they faced (and this is a favor, trust me), Hawaii's opponents have an average total offense rank of 63 and a total defense rank of 79. The Warriors' opponents also average 5 wins and 8 losses per game on the season. Once again, I did Hawaii a favor and excluded the division 1AA teams from this figure. Take all of this into account and add to it the fact that Hawaii played two teams with winning records this season. Someone is out there saying that Hawaii is undefeated, Hawaii has a great offense, no team from a BCS conference not named Washington would play the Warriors. This team deserves to be in the BCS. How sure are you? You do realize that before all of these losses near or at the end of the season, the BCS expanded its pool from which to choose at-large teams for the BCS bowl games. If Hawaii would have won out, they would have been in a BCS bowl. If Boise State had beaten Hawaii, this still may not have assured the Broncos a BCS bowl spot. Then, the political guys would have heads rolling again because the mid-majors missed out on another bowl that pays huge. The WAC commissioner said that he didn't think this would affect Hawaii's or Boise's State chances of getting a BCS bowl. Of course, he would say that. He probably doesn't know that Hawaii has played a schedule with two junior varsity teams. Is he aware that extending the pool of at-large teams to choose from actually improves their chances without automatically qualifying? Now, we can take a look at history. This history lesson involves the BCS and the teams that weren't included way back when. Well, forget all of that. Don't worry about the beginning of the BCS in 1998. All you have to know is that Utah was the first non-BCS team to make a BCS bowl from the 2004 season. The Utes faced a Texas A&M team that went 6 - 5 (7 - 5 with the bowl win), a 3 - 8 Arizona team, and North Carolina that had a 6 - 5 season (6 - 6 season including the bowl game). That's three BCS teams for Utah and the Utes' opponents averaged 5 wins and 6 losses per game for the 2004 season. To make their case even stronger, the Utes went undefeated that year without playing a division 1AA team. The BCS bowls didn't have any mid-major teams in their premiere bowls for the 2005 season. Then, the Boise State Broncos crashed the party in 2006. The Broncos beat Oregon State (the Beavers had a 9 - 4 season; 10 - 4 with the bowl win). The Broncos' opponents averaged 6 wins and 6 losses per game for the 2006 season. Oh yeah, the guys from the blue turf only played one division 1AA team in their quest to BCS greatness.
So, now can you tell me what makes Hawaii so deserving? Story writing contestLog in or create an account to vote for this story!
|
Related Links |
||||||