2008 NFL Week 12 Picks and Podcast: Live Thursday at 8PM ET | Week 11

MLB General

Do The Bonds Boogie

By Dan Hiergesell, Section MLB
Posted on Wed May 17 2006 at 5:54 PM EST Printer Friendly Page
More on: (all tags)

You put your left arm in, you take your left arm out, you put your left arm in, and shake it all about, twist the needle in and pour all the juice out, that's what the Bonds Boogie's all about.  

I have written a few articles for this web site and some off-line, but none have ever slandered any player or team throughout the MLB, now and in the past.  In an article I posted a few weeks ago, I proclaimed how Bonds will forever be an "ageless icon, no matter how many pills he pops", but I regret to inform a direct feeling of remorse towards that statement.  After witnessing his chase for Ruth, there have been a few conclusions brought to my attention, and not just the fact that this week has been the most boring week of Bonds/Baseball coverage EVER!  It's the fact that we are watching a seemingly deceiving cheater chase down one of the most prestigious records in sports, held by on my account, the greatest baseball player ever.  It has got to stop.  "Should we take the record away if Bonds gets it?"  "Should we allow him to be put into the record books?"  All pay attention to what this article entails.  This is not a direct boast against steroids even though it has penetrated Sports forever, but it is to recognize Bonds as a "timed icon" that drains baseball of it's credible past every single time he interrupts Sports Center so they can bring coverage of him striking out.

Going back to the early 90's, we witnessed the speedy, 5 tooled young'n who stretched the field in Pittsburgh and years to follow in San Fran, although, something happened in between the 97' and 98' seasons. That infamous transition took away speed and agility and replaced those lost attributes with power and more power. Bonds was introduced to a pill/injection of some sort, or as we know it, steroids.

"Hmmm, what's this?" "Take it kid. It'll give you the power of BigMac and Slammin' Sammy".

Bonds took it, or as most politically correct writers and journalists would say, "allegedly took it". It's sodomy, the way we have been blinded so clearly from the truth that players all around the league, from Alex Sanchez to the "great" Barry Bonds take enhancements, for the most part, illegally. The facts are there.

One: The mysterious increase of 24 homeruns between one season.

Two: The speed, where has all the speed gone. In the early 90's to the mid-90's, Bonds was able to smack 30-40 homers while swiping 30-40 bags, an aged 1:1 ratio. Considering this, Bonds had not had more than 50 stolen bases over his past 5 complete seasons, even though he stole 40 or more bases 3 times in his career (90', 91', and 96'). His homerun/stolen base ratio has now dropped, over the past 5 years, to almost 6:1. Considering the record breaking times he has been walked, these numbers are extremely and dangerously low. The only conclusion is obviously, lack of speed. This loss of speed, can only be obtained by taking steroids and obtaining more muscle than Hollywood Hogan. He has drained out his speed, for so much more power, which lead to his overwhelming homerun stats. This coming in the midst of a few seasons, while baseball at the same time, was introduced to some of the best pitchers in the past decade.

Three: The testimonies, the books, the former players and their costly deaths, have all put steroids in direct relationship to baseball, starting back in the early 90's. It's here and more players than Bonds do it. Only a few have been caught, but for ANYONE to bury the idea of Bonds using performance-enhancing drugs, is profoundly absurd.

These are merely scrap points in the entire case against Bonds. Not only the case against him brought up by Supreme Court, but also the case against him brought up by the fans of baseball, whether they have seen Bonds play High School ball or just watch him on TV. He has put himself on the map as one of the best players to obtain great stats in the history of baseball, I will give him that. But to subject his career, which is simply steroid based, as one of the best ever, is truly idiotic. Mantle, Ruth, Mays, Aaron, Williams, and even Cal Ripken, are just a few players that easily outrank Bonds on the list of greatest all-around players ever to step on the field.

The argument is there. Some point out the aspect of actually hitting a homerun, for the fact that power isn't the only skill needed to be developed in order to become a homerun hitter. It's reaction and sight. Barry Bonds fully possess that skill. It is one of the only things he might actually be the best at since he was always able to hit 30-40 homers while batting over .300 (higher than the 9 players below him on the all-time homerun list). But this isn't the point. The point is Ruth. It all lies with Ruth. The hard throwing, hard-hitting lefty has brought up a quite bit of controversy. And frankly, the record with always stick with Ruth. It'll always stick with the top 25-homerun hitters of all time, except Bonds/McGwire/Sosa. Even Griffey, regarding being a top player in baseball history, takes the stand over all three of them. Time will tell, for when and I mean when Bonds passes Ruth, we will see the disgusting side of baseball. This will be the last straw in the Bonds era and it is safe to say, we will not see him hitting anymore homers after this year.

All in all, I highly recommend diving yourself into the pool of truth. Watch videos, take notes, record past stats, read every article regarding BALCO and the use of steroids in sports, and start to make accusations because that is all the fans have. It is not in our hands and that is what really ticks me off. The fans, who for the most part pay the salaries of the players, will never have a say towards the outcome or punishment of Barry Bonds. We can throw all the memorabilia we want or draw all the signs and hold them up all 9 innings, Bonds will always be a cheat and just might, take over Ruth's spot that needs no taking.

Story writing contest

Log in or create an account to vote for this story!
< Could Albert Pujols at only age 26, already be considered the greatest hitter ever? | Pitcher's Renaissance >
Display: Sort:
Do The Bonds Boogie | 15 comments (7 topical, 8 editorial, 0 hidden)
I voted 'no' based on the faulty logic (#1)
by FHenkel on Sun May 14 2006 at 2:27 AM EST
My personal opinion of Bonds is opposite of yours, but that's not why I voted this one down.  

First, this series of quotes:

 "Hmmm, what's this?"  "Take it kid.  It'll give you the power of BigMac and Slammin' Sammy".

...is completely ridiculous.  If it was meant to be so stupid that it isn't believable, then you need to be more obvious with that, because some people here haven't read Game of Shadows or Juicing the Game.  If it was meant to be a quick synopsis of what "allegedly" took place, it's way off.

Next, I take issue with the fact that you say Bonds isn't considered one of the best players of all time, because the truth is that he IS widely considered to be the best left fielder of all time by many esteemed and prestigious baseball writers, broadcasters, and players --to include Joe Morgan (who kind of fits into all 3 categories).

Finally, your most egregious act IMO was your use of stats, namely stolen bases, to mislead the reader.  Why do you say that he failed to reach 50 SB's over his last 5 seasons?  He's never reached that plateau!  You fail to mention that:

  1.  His SB production dropped starting in 1999, when he was 34 years old.

  2.  His SB success rate actually went UP starting in 1999.  

  3.  He's the only guy in history with 500 HR's and 500 SB's, proving that he DID possess both speed and power through the entire prime of his career.

  4.  SB production in the entire major leagues decreased almost 60% after 1998.  It wasn't just Bonds, it was EVERYBODY.

  5.  After 1999, his HR's increased slightly, while his AB's decreased slightly.  This means that in a greater percentage of the time, he's reaching base via HR,  and therefore has no opportunity to steal a base.

  6.  Bonds' SB production went WAY down in 1999 after he had KNEE SURGERY!!!!  

Damn man, there is enough compelling evidence to convict Bonds.  Why do you have to make it up for crying out loud?!?!?!?!?

And I did mess up in that post (#2)
by FHenkel on Sun May 14 2006 at 2:29 AM EST
I meant to go back and say that he only reached 50 SB's once (in 1990, when he was 25 years old), instead of never.

[ Parent ]
Well well well (#3)
by JDWC on Sun May 14 2006 at 5:17 PM EST
Someone's a Giants fan...
J.D.
[ Parent ]
LOL!!! No, I'm an Indians fan (#5)
by FHenkel on Sun May 14 2006 at 8:52 PM EST
Yeah, I said it:  Hi.  My name is Frank, and I'm from Cleveland.

lol

No, but really.  In the real world, I work as a data analyst for the government, and us (mostly) dorky analysts have a little saying:

Most people use stats as a drunk uses a lamp post:  for support rather than illumination.

I hate it when people blatantly slant half of the stats to support their arguements.  Especially in the Bonds case, where it isn't necessary, there are plenty of statistics that clearly DO support the BALCO investigation's claims.  Use THOSE, not some phantom stolen base numbers.

<Climbing off my soap box> Okay, I'm calm now :-)

Damnit!! (#6)
by FHenkel on Sun May 14 2006 at 8:55 PM EST
This was supposed to be a reply to JDWC's comment.  I wonder what happened?

[ Parent ]
give me a break (#7)
by Dan Hiergesell on Sun May 14 2006 at 11:25 PM EST
Please man! Everyone who follows baseball and knows about Bonds, is subject to all those same repetitive lines of stats that I purposely didn't put it my article.  Like I said, this issue is totally up to yourself, i'm not tryin to persuade anyone, just giving some new material and facts on how he could be using steroids.  So give us all a break and go crunch some numbers NERD!

[ Parent ]
My my (#9)
by FHenkel on Tue May 16 2006 at 3:21 PM EST
Aren't we testy?  My point was that you should state your argument, not fabricate one out of thin air.  I told you why I voted it down.   I couldn't care less whether you take my advice or not, but I'll continue to vote down crap that doesn't measure up to the standards of previous articles on this website.

[ Parent ]
Do The Bonds Boogie | 15 comments (7 topical, 8 editorial, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:


Login

Create an account

User ID:
Passwd:

Forgot your password?

Poll

Bonds' Career?
Top Ten all-time
Greatest all-time
A mere image of steroids
Nothing more than baseball's puppet

Votes: 12
Results | Other Polls