one disagreement i have is temple over mich st.. i know the A-10 hs recked havoc all season long but i think St joes will be the team to do it in the tourney not temple. i only say that cause i feel like neitzel being a senior will get the job done.. at least for the first round.
agree with wash st being shaky. and the only problem i have with pitt is this.. and its happened before in the big east. i team gets hot, wins the championship after being shaky all season (granted they had injuries) and everyone jumps on their ship. i agree they are a tough team, i have them winning two i believe, but the atmosphere in which they were in over the weekend was very home friendly... now they that go away from home are they gonna be the same team? i guess we'll find out.
i don't like g'town at all in the final four if kansas doesnt make it.. i could see tha badgers beating g'town. but then again i have g'town losing to davidson in the 2nd round. just jinxed it prolly.
all in all, when it comes down to the end, we both agree on the national champion. final four in 06.. runner ups in 07.. national champs in 08 baby. UCLA! go bruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuinsssss!
The thing about the Temple-Michigan State call is that everybody is basically calling it. Sometimes when that happens, it is better to go the other way. "No, cause it ain't sh*t. Ain't nothing but 10 grand. What's 10 grand to me? Ain't sh*t ... Next time I might shake my d*ck." --Randy Moss [ Parent ]
Create an account