The reason why you put the age restriction in is because it increases the profile of each player and makes them a brand image before they get to the NBA. It is easier to do this with guys that have been in college for a couple years. Plus it will improve the overall caliber of the league. Guys like Sebastian Telfair would have been forced to learn how to play instead of getting thrown to the wolves. "No, cause it ain't sh*t. Ain't nothing but 10 grand. What's 10 grand to me? Ain't sh*t ... Next time I might shake my d*ck." --Randy Moss [ Parent ]
As far as the NFL goes... that's exactly what they're doing. NFL network gets random games? The coveted Monday Night Football slot going to ESPN? Not quite the same level, but each football game counts for more than an NBA one.
Finally, I agree with you about cultivating a product, I'm simply stating the problem with the age-limit defense for the NBA...obviously it's beneficial for the NBA to have many players develop before hitting the league, but unlike football, they can't justify it AS much in terms of defending themselves form an age-discrimination lawsuit. There are too many high-school to superstar cases to argue otherwise (even if the development took a few years in the league). The NFL can just argue that a 19 year-old will get killed playing with 300 pound behemoths, but the NBA doesn't have that route. [ Parent ]
Create an account